• Roulette Records Artists
• Record Roulette Club

Official World Record Association was created as a NGO organization to promote, verify, catalog and register world records. Our authorized members, check, verify and admit, the authenticity of the world record applications, and finally register the world records. Elaborate the rules and regulations to set or to break the world records.

Cheers for that. I have been testing out what I call a 11 spin delay Martingale, which means, I wait till I see an 11 same colour streak, then I begin a $50.00 Martingale rally from that point and so far so good.

Someone please file this under ' Famous Last Words.'

Someone please file this under ' Famous Last Words.'

'You guys' are fuc**n brutal here. Maybe a second job is in order or a hobby......something? Geez!
Hey Sally4eva >> Good luck with your style of play, I appreciate your posts.
Ken

Can anyone out there tell me:
In their experience playing LIVE European Roulette (Whether in a bricks and mortar casino or LIVE Dealers Online)
1. What is the biggest rally of BLACK you have ever seen or heard of to occur 'in a row'? (ie: have you seen 16 blacks in a row? 20, 25, 30?)
2.What is the biggest rally for ODD you have ever seen or heard about in 23 years to occur 'in a row' (ie: have you seen or heard of 16 odds in a row? 20, 25, 30?)
Cheers,
Anthony

Sally4eva i am going to put it polite and show you how no roulette systems work - is much better that you observe and not play at all.
You can download numbers from random org witch would be the same as any existing wheel.
Pick 100.000 trails with the numbers 1 and 2 witch would be the same as red and black.
Now do that for a week and you will see 8 in a row 9 in a row 10 in a row 11 in a row 12 in a row 13 in a row 14 in a row 15 in a row 16 in a row 17 in a row 18 in a row 19 in a row 20 in a row 21 in a row 22 in a row 23 in a row ...
Sonner or later you will find so many in a row that your Martingale will lose and you will never gain back your lose.
This means that nothing is due to happen - nothing.
I belive the record is around 32 in a row or witch i read been observed.
It would be the same thing if you pick 11 past results and bet against them, sooner or later the past result will repeat it self and you will have 22 similiar results or 32 similiar results depending how many you pick.
There is no way around a 50/50 distribution - every thing can happen - and randomness allways find its way around any bet selection you can think of or create.
You should look up the topic regarding Gamblers Fallacy.
Remember this and never forget it:
1. Gamblers fallacy - no past results matters or influence future ones it is still 50/50 even if you see 100 reds in a row.
2. The game it self has a negativ expectaion with mean there does not exist any postive expectaion playing the game.

Roulette Records Artists

3. All gambling books you can find are garbage and will never make you a long term winner.
4. The house edge will allways manifest ...
Aks you self why would you play when there is no way to win in the long run.
Well maybe you want to go out and relax with friends and have a good time and try your luck that evning.

Record Roulette Club

Then you might find one gambling book usefull.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle. Next step is pretty ugly-

Someone please file this under ' Famous Last Words.'

I don't know how long he has to wait around for a sequence consisting of eleven of the same color, but if the sequences all turn out to have been ONLY eleven of the same color in a row then that file folder marked Famous Last Words can be in gold.

Sally4eva i am going to put it polite and show you how no roulette systems work - is much better that you observe and not play at all.
You can download numbers from random org witch would be the same as any existing wheel.
Pick 100.000 trails with the numbers 1 and 2 witch would be the same as red and black.
Now do that for a week and you will see 8 in a row 9 in a row 10 in a row 11 in a row 12 in a row 13 in a row 14 in a row 15 in a row 16 in a row 17 in a row 18 in a row 19 in a row 20 in a row 21 in a row 22 in a row 23 in a row ...
Sonner or later you will find so many in a row that your Martingale will lose and you will never gain back your lose.
This means that nothing is due to happen - nothing.
I belive the record is around 32 in a row or witch i read been observed.
It would be the same thing if you pick 11 past results and bet against them, sooner or later the past result will repeat it self and you will have 22 similiar results or 32 similiar results depending how many you pick.
There is no way around a 50/50 distribution - every thing can happen - and randomness allways find its way around any bet selection you can think of or create.
You should look up the topic regarding Gamblers Fallacy.
Remember this and never forget it:
1. Gamblers fallacy - no past results matters or influence future ones it is still 50/50 even if you see 100 reds in a row.
2. The game it self has a negativ expectaion with mean there does not exist any postive expectaion playing the game.
3. All gambling books you can find are garbage and will never make you a long term winner.
4. The house edge will allways manifest ...
Aks you self why would you play when there is no way to win in the long run.
Well maybe you want to go out and relax with friends and have a good time and try your luck that evning.
Then you might find one gambling book usefull.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle. Next step is pretty ugly-

100 REDS in a row??? Really? Even when it's already been established that 32 is the world record? I agree, 11 in a row means nothing, but let's double it to 22 in a row of red or black, high or low, and odd / even. This 'delayed martingale' would have some validity. The 1st response questioned time, and what it would take to wait for a streak of 11, let alone a massive streak of 22 to emerge. But what if? What if??? What if you could be omnipresent to all the roulette wheels in Vegas? Your buzzed, teleported, whatever you wanna call it, PRESENT at 22 in a row, which would happen a few times a year. Would you at that point, believe that the 'regression to the mean gods' carry any weight? And I'm not talking the next spin, which yes is 50/50, but playing the wheel until that 100% red percentage expierienced regression to say, sub 95%. Look forward to replies, I for one would be initially small bankrollin' it, because it would take a run of historic, eternal proportions to bankrupt me.

100 REDS in a row??? Really? Even when it's already been established that 32 is the world record? I agree, 11 in a row means nothing, but let's double it to 22 in a row of red or black, high or low, and odd / even. This 'delayed martingale' would have some validity. The 1st response questioned time, and what it would take to wait for a streak of 11, let alone a massive streak of 22 to emerge. But what if? What if??? What if you could be omnipresent to all the roulette wheels in Vegas? Your buzzed, teleported, whatever you wanna call it, PRESENT at 22 in a row, which would happen a few times a year. Would you at that point, believe that the 'regression to the mean gods' carry any weight? And I'm not talking the next spin, which yes is 50/50, but playing the wheel until that 100% red percentage expierienced regression to say, sub 95%. Look forward to replies, I for one would be initially small bankrollin' it, because it would take a run of historic, eternal proportions to bankrupt me.

I understand there's a game in Jagofastan where red has not shown 23,412 times in a row. Unbiased wheel. 18/18 red,black.....single zero of course. An oil sheik has been using the martingale and is taking a beating.....have you wondered why oil prices are rising?